Members of the government’s political opposition were quick to condemn the deal, many citing Elbit’s links to Israeli crimes against Palestinians: “If the accusation is correct, I do not believe that Elbit Systems can be awarded the contract. Although financial reasons were cited for the breakdown of negotiations, many commentators suggested that public pressure played a key part. With such a controversial background, why is the “social democratic” Danish government led by Mette Frederiksen so keen to sign a new arms deal to replace French artillery systems that have been sent to Ukraine? Where are the dissenting voices?īack in 2015, the Danish government, led by Lars Lokke Rasmussen and his center-right Liberal Party ( Parti Venstre), were forced to back out of a deal with Elbit for a shipment of ATMOS artillery systems following widespread public pressure and political opposition. Promotes awareness and respect for human rights, democratic values and norms in the democratic governance and development processes at the national, regional and global levels.Israel’s largest military company, Elbit Systems, has been accused of a plethora of questionable actions relating to its provision of surveillance equipment and drones to the Israeli military for repressive use against Palestinians in the occupied territory, as well as shady business deals and corruption.Organises public forum to foster popular participation in development policy thinking, dialogue and consensus building on economic and social development issues and fos-ters strategic partnership between non-state and state actors for resolving them.Develops ideas and methods for effective participation of non-state actors in demo-cratic development and accountable governance processes including conflict resolution.Publishes and disseminates research findings so as to enlighten public policy debates and strengthen advocacy for alternative development strategies.Carries out research and analysis of public policies, including monitoring their impact on democracy, good governance and the poor and vulnerable in society.In pursuance of this mission, and working mainly through policy research, dialogue, advocacy, and training, the IDEG: Its mission is to generate knowledge and enhance the capacity of citizens to influence public policy choices, in order to consolidate democratic and good governance in Ghana and the rest of Africa. The Institute for Democratic Governance (IDEG) is an independent, not-for-profit, and non-partisan policy research and advocacy institute established in January 2000. To support small parties to outline and implement a focused plan of integrated actions aimed at boosting their capacity to mobilize party followers, in particular women and youth, as well as ordinary constituents and promote issue based policies for strength-ening the multiparty system.To convene the small parties and raise their awareness of common challenges, pro-spects and means for increasing their outreach to the electorate and ways of improving election conduct, while averting violence together with the strategies for achieving these goals and.More specifically, the partnerships’ objectives are: Furthermore, the project will seek to strengthen the cross-political cooperation between these parties in search of consensus for reforms, that can open up the space for a stronger political participation. In the partnership’s initial phase, the focus is on building the capacities of selected smaller political parties, thereby helping them to enhance the mobilisation of in particular women and youth and to overcome their structural weaknesses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |